Skip to content

Conversation

@SudoVim
Copy link

@SudoVim SudoVim commented Jun 25, 2022

Hi @cjslep,

Please thoroughly review this Pull Request!

Here is the issue related to this PR: #157

I understand Pull Requests without having a corresponding issue will be
automatically rejected.

  • It looks like these tests were added a while back and have been broken
    for an indeterminate period of time. Since the GitHub workflow was
    added, this has translated into a bunch of failed actions.
  • I went ahead and fixed the broken tests. For the most part, it looks
    like there are missing mocks for the Lock, InboxForActor, and Unlock for
    each recipient. I made sure that this behavior does indeed exist in
    the code.
  • In addition, there was an extra "Host" header added to another test.

- It looks like these tests were added a while back and have been broken
  for an indeterminate period of time. Since the GitHub workflow was
  added, this has translated into a bunch of failed actions.
- I went ahead and fixed the broken tests. For the most part, it looks
  like there are missing mocks for the Lock, InboxForActor, and Unlock for
  each recipient. I made sure that this behavior does indeed exist in
  the code.
- In addition, there was an extra "Host" header added to another test.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant